|
Is $0$ a natural number? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
From the Wikipedia article: In mathematics, there are two conventions for the set of natural numbers: it is either the set of positive integers $\ {1, 2, 3, \dots\}$ according to the traditional definition; or the set of non-negative integers $\ {0, 1, 2,\dots\}$ according to a definition first appearing in the nineteenth century.
discrete mathematics - What is the difference between natural numbers ...
The natural numbers have different definitions depending on the book, sometimes the natural numbers is just the postivite integers $\mathbb N=\mathbb Z^+$, but other times the natural numbers are actually the non-negative numbers $\mathbb N=\ {0,1,2,\dots\}$.
What are natural numbers? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
What are the natural numbers? Is it a valid question at all? My understanding is that a set satisfying Peano axioms is called "the natural numbers" and from that one builds integers, rational numb...
Is the sum of all natural numbers $-\frac {1} {12}$? [duplicate]
Even more, how can the sum of any set of positive numbers be negative? These two ideas lead me to think of inductive proofs as to why the first statement is incorrect. Which of the two lines of reasoning is correct and why? Are there any proven applications (i.e. non theoretical) which use the first statement?
elementary set theory - Natural numbers as a subset of integer numbers ...
3 Within set theory, having the natural numbers $\mathbb {N}$ built as the minimal inductive set with the corresponding additive and multiplicative operations defined, integers $\mathbb {Z}$ can be set as equivalence classes of parallel diagonals of $\mathbb {N}\times\mathbb {N}$, which contain a copy of the natural numbers.
natural numbers - Why is the sum over all positive integers equal to -1 ...
Recently, sources for mathematical infotainment, for example numberphile, have given some information on the interpretation of divergent series as real numbers, for example $\\sum_{i=0}^\\infty i = ...
Why set of natural numbers is infinite, while each natural number is ...
In his book Analysis Vol. 1, author Terence Tao argues that while each natural number is finite, the set of natural numbers is infinite (though has not defined what infinite means yet). Using Peano...
What is a natural number? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
That being said, this "inductive set" definition of the natural numbers comes from a book on analysis, not axiomatic set theory. The goal of the book is to do real analysis (i.e. to study limits, differentiation, integration, etc. in the context of real functions of real nubmers). If you had to start from $\mathsf {ZFC}$ and build up your number systems from there, you could never get to the ...
abstract algebra - Why is the set of natural numbers not considered a ...
I don't understand why the set of natural numbers constitutes a commutative monoid with addition, but is not considered an Abelian group.
Does the set of natural numbers contain infinity? [duplicate]
8 One property about the set $\Bbb N$ of natural numbers is that it does not have a largest element, so if you defined $\infty$ as some element which is larger than every natural number, it wouldn't be in $\Bbb N$ anyway because of this property.
|
